<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Gimp Sucks.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://piestar.net/2009/03/01/gimp-sucks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://piestar.net/2009/03/01/gimp-sucks/</link>
	<description>A pragmatic look at the state of FOSS</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 12:11:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Qkod</title>
		<link>http://piestar.net/2009/03/01/gimp-sucks/#comment-8445</link>
		<dc:creator>Qkod</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jul 2010 16:11:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://piestar.net/?p=17#comment-8445</guid>
		<description>Gimp is being promoted by a bunch of elitists who would like you to believe that their underground, masochistic ways are far superior to yours.

It&#039;s being different for being different&#039;s sake.

I downloaded a portable version of it because I needed it to do some on-the-fly photo-editing. It&#039;s terrible. As some other user mentionned, you can open photoshop (or even paint shop pro) and do some very decent work with it after a few hours. You don&#039;t even need tutorials, half a brain is enough. 

Gimp is clunky. It&#039;s like a neurotic girlfriend. It&#039;s not that she&#039;s different, that she&#039;s deep or complex... she&#039;s just neurotic and complicated. She&#039;s a freak. She&#039;s a pain to fool around with.

To top it off, she&#039;s not even good looking.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gimp is being promoted by a bunch of elitists who would like you to believe that their underground, masochistic ways are far superior to yours.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s being different for being different&#8217;s sake.</p>
<p>I downloaded a portable version of it because I needed it to do some on-the-fly photo-editing. It&#8217;s terrible. As some other user mentionned, you can open photoshop (or even paint shop pro) and do some very decent work with it after a few hours. You don&#8217;t even need tutorials, half a brain is enough. </p>
<p>Gimp is clunky. It&#8217;s like a neurotic girlfriend. It&#8217;s not that she&#8217;s different, that she&#8217;s deep or complex&#8230; she&#8217;s just neurotic and complicated. She&#8217;s a freak. She&#8217;s a pain to fool around with.</p>
<p>To top it off, she&#8217;s not even good looking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EPonj</title>
		<link>http://piestar.net/2009/03/01/gimp-sucks/#comment-8004</link>
		<dc:creator>EPonj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jun 2010 16:18:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://piestar.net/?p=17#comment-8004</guid>
		<description>Hello, I just found this site googleing &#039;gimp sucks&#039;. Not that Gimp is useless for me, but being very familiar with Photoshop, you&#039;ll undestand Gimp offered me a good deal of frustration.
First of all, even for basic tasks, just double or triple the number of clicks needed.
Advanced tasks... what are you talking about??? Gimp doesn&#039;t know that.
I&#039;ll pass on the list of usefull/important features Gimp lacks.
Interface / Windows management: OMFG not only badly thought, it&#039;s even bugged. when I select a image window, it remains behing the others. I have to click elsewhere and click again on that window. 3 clicks for 1...
Ssssssssssssssslllllllllllllllllloooooooooooooooooowwwwwwwwwwww.......
Some effects take forever to calculate (core i7 920, 6GB RAM). Have a look at the ressource monitor: 25% of one core used... wtf?

And on and on, yes, Gimp still lives in the 90s.

There may be a reason no professional designer would work with Gimp. The productivity you gain working with Photoshop is worth Adobe&#039;s rip off (good thing for them they still have a monopoly on that)

But Gimp is free, developped by a bunch of passionate people working on it because they believe in the open source ideology. So do I.
If Photoshop allows you to do &#039;whatever you want&#039;, Gimp still gives you a lot of possibilities for free. I&#039;ve yet to find a Photoshop &#039;equivalent&#039; that performs better than Gimp for free.
And by the way I&#039;d love to find a InDesign and Illustrator &#039;equivalent&#039; for free (well, I could pirate them, but I don&#039;t do this (anymore)). And please don&#039;t start with PaintShop, it sucks even more...

Bottom line: Of course, Gimp doesn&#039;t reach the heel of Photoshop, arguing otherwise is plain fanboyism. I&#039;d laugh at a pro graphic designer working with Gimp. But in a non professional environment, Gimp is a pretty usefull Photoshop replacement. Now, if you have too much money, you can buy Photoshop so you can use it twice a month to resize your family pics, but most people don&#039;t have that kind of money, and surely wouldn&#039;t spend it on a piece of software they barely use.

Last thing (off topic): I sense this blog is kind of anti open source. I have a problem with this. The open source community has brought a lot to the computing experience for everyone (open source components being used in every OS). Some Linux distros are in par with WinXP (concerning the UI only, as the amount of functionalities has always been far beyond with Linux), which still dominates the OS landscape. OK, 7 is yet another step forward that Linux hasn&#039;t reached yet (still UI speaking), but Vista was a step backwards (speaking about stability and performance).
Again, Linux is free while Windows is a rip off. Plus, most users would be better off running Linux at home. You know, those who use only Internet, Media Player, Mail, light Office works... Those who call me every month because they got yet another malware (not arguing about Windows security here, I know it&#039;s the only OS that&#039;s targetted by malware makers).
Linux (like OSX but it&#039;s another debate and Apple must die anyway): you just don&#039;t have to worry about it. You go wherever you want to without having to think if you should click on that link or not.

Ok, I&#039;ll stopp here or I&#039;ll spend the night on it, but you got the point ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello, I just found this site googleing &#8216;gimp sucks&#8217;. Not that Gimp is useless for me, but being very familiar with Photoshop, you&#8217;ll undestand Gimp offered me a good deal of frustration.<br />
First of all, even for basic tasks, just double or triple the number of clicks needed.<br />
Advanced tasks&#8230; what are you talking about??? Gimp doesn&#8217;t know that.<br />
I&#8217;ll pass on the list of usefull/important features Gimp lacks.<br />
Interface / Windows management: OMFG not only badly thought, it&#8217;s even bugged. when I select a image window, it remains behing the others. I have to click elsewhere and click again on that window. 3 clicks for 1&#8230;<br />
Ssssssssssssssslllllllllllllllllloooooooooooooooooowwwwwwwwwwww&#8230;&#8230;.<br />
Some effects take forever to calculate (core i7 920, 6GB RAM). Have a look at the ressource monitor: 25% of one core used&#8230; wtf?</p>
<p>And on and on, yes, Gimp still lives in the 90s.</p>
<p>There may be a reason no professional designer would work with Gimp. The productivity you gain working with Photoshop is worth Adobe&#8217;s rip off (good thing for them they still have a monopoly on that)</p>
<p>But Gimp is free, developped by a bunch of passionate people working on it because they believe in the open source ideology. So do I.<br />
If Photoshop allows you to do &#8216;whatever you want&#8217;, Gimp still gives you a lot of possibilities for free. I&#8217;ve yet to find a Photoshop &#8216;equivalent&#8217; that performs better than Gimp for free.<br />
And by the way I&#8217;d love to find a InDesign and Illustrator &#8216;equivalent&#8217; for free (well, I could pirate them, but I don&#8217;t do this (anymore)). And please don&#8217;t start with PaintShop, it sucks even more&#8230;</p>
<p>Bottom line: Of course, Gimp doesn&#8217;t reach the heel of Photoshop, arguing otherwise is plain fanboyism. I&#8217;d laugh at a pro graphic designer working with Gimp. But in a non professional environment, Gimp is a pretty usefull Photoshop replacement. Now, if you have too much money, you can buy Photoshop so you can use it twice a month to resize your family pics, but most people don&#8217;t have that kind of money, and surely wouldn&#8217;t spend it on a piece of software they barely use.</p>
<p>Last thing (off topic): I sense this blog is kind of anti open source. I have a problem with this. The open source community has brought a lot to the computing experience for everyone (open source components being used in every OS). Some Linux distros are in par with WinXP (concerning the UI only, as the amount of functionalities has always been far beyond with Linux), which still dominates the OS landscape. OK, 7 is yet another step forward that Linux hasn&#8217;t reached yet (still UI speaking), but Vista was a step backwards (speaking about stability and performance).<br />
Again, Linux is free while Windows is a rip off. Plus, most users would be better off running Linux at home. You know, those who use only Internet, Media Player, Mail, light Office works&#8230; Those who call me every month because they got yet another malware (not arguing about Windows security here, I know it&#8217;s the only OS that&#8217;s targetted by malware makers).<br />
Linux (like OSX but it&#8217;s another debate and Apple must die anyway): you just don&#8217;t have to worry about it. You go wherever you want to without having to think if you should click on that link or not.</p>
<p>Ok, I&#8217;ll stopp here or I&#8217;ll spend the night on it, but you got the point <img src='http://piestar.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AdobeMan</title>
		<link>http://piestar.net/2009/03/01/gimp-sucks/#comment-7856</link>
		<dc:creator>AdobeMan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2010 07:42:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://piestar.net/?p=17#comment-7856</guid>
		<description>the best open software is Blender it&#039;s fast reliable and has a game engine sculpt tool and smoke and fluid simulation, the reason I bring it up is because not all open source software is shit just most of them lol

Blender over Zbrush, MAX, maya, fumeFX
Photoshop &gt; gimp
windows &gt; mac
windows &gt; ubuntu(but not by much the only reason I don&#039;t permanently use ubuntu is because ubuntu cant run FL Studio, photoshop, dreamweaver without some hicups, witch I use alot)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the best open software is Blender it&#8217;s fast reliable and has a game engine sculpt tool and smoke and fluid simulation, the reason I bring it up is because not all open source software is shit just most of them lol</p>
<p>Blender over Zbrush, MAX, maya, fumeFX<br />
Photoshop &gt; gimp<br />
windows &gt; mac<br />
windows &gt; ubuntu(but not by much the only reason I don&#8217;t permanently use ubuntu is because ubuntu cant run FL Studio, photoshop, dreamweaver without some hicups, witch I use alot)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AdobeMan</title>
		<link>http://piestar.net/2009/03/01/gimp-sucks/#comment-7855</link>
		<dc:creator>AdobeMan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2010 07:28:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://piestar.net/?p=17#comment-7855</guid>
		<description>Best article I&#039;ve read since hearing about cs5, Kudos to you good sir</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Best article I&#8217;ve read since hearing about cs5, Kudos to you good sir</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pidds</title>
		<link>http://piestar.net/2009/03/01/gimp-sucks/#comment-7793</link>
		<dc:creator>Pidds</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jun 2010 08:46:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://piestar.net/?p=17#comment-7793</guid>
		<description>Lasse.
We are soul mates.
I found this blog by doing the exact same search.
Sometimes I want to cry, because Gimp exists, and people use it, and sing its praises.
I would seriously rather use MS Paint.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lasse.<br />
We are soul mates.<br />
I found this blog by doing the exact same search.<br />
Sometimes I want to cry, because Gimp exists, and people use it, and sing its praises.<br />
I would seriously rather use MS Paint.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Claudio</title>
		<link>http://piestar.net/2009/03/01/gimp-sucks/#comment-7766</link>
		<dc:creator>Claudio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jun 2010 08:13:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://piestar.net/?p=17#comment-7766</guid>
		<description>I use Gimp because it&#039;s free. I&#039;m now considering the TONS OF HOURS I have wasted figuring out even the most simple things, such as moving a selection to start with, I guess I would have wasted less money by buying a commercial product in the first place. More than once I was forced to revert to mspaint(!!!) to get things done quickly!!!!
And why the hell do gimp windows always have to open BEHIND all other windows? It must really take a programmer time and effort to devise such crazy ass GUI behaviour!
I&#039;d better stop commenting now as I&#039;m getting nervous. Gimp is a CROCK OF SHIT!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I use Gimp because it&#8217;s free. I&#8217;m now considering the TONS OF HOURS I have wasted figuring out even the most simple things, such as moving a selection to start with, I guess I would have wasted less money by buying a commercial product in the first place. More than once I was forced to revert to mspaint(!!!) to get things done quickly!!!!<br />
And why the hell do gimp windows always have to open BEHIND all other windows? It must really take a programmer time and effort to devise such crazy ass GUI behaviour!<br />
I&#8217;d better stop commenting now as I&#8217;m getting nervous. Gimp is a CROCK OF SHIT!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lasse</title>
		<link>http://piestar.net/2009/03/01/gimp-sucks/#comment-7673</link>
		<dc:creator>Lasse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jun 2010 18:16:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://piestar.net/?p=17#comment-7673</guid>
		<description>I googled &quot;gimp is the worst piece of shit program I&#039;ve ever used&quot; and found this article.

I used Photoshop for many years, but decided to stop doing so when they began including the Apple virus called Bonjour with the package. Instead I&#039;ve been using GIMP, and it is a source of so much frustration, it&#039;s a wonder I haven&#039;t had a heart attack yet. Everything, EVERY LITTLE FUCKING THING, defaults to the LAST possible thing you would want it to do, EVERYTHING is 100% counter-intuitive, to the extent that I have burst out laughing on many occasions. I often sit, mouth agape, staring in disbelief at the shit this program does. Just copy/pasting something is a NIGHTMARISH EXPERIENCE. I simply refuse to believe that this software was put together by people who have EVER used software of this type for anything other than doodling with the pencil tool.

I have never felt such deep-seated hatred for software before. GIMP is the worst, most amateurish piece of shit program I&#039;ve ever used. And I&#039;m including stuff like iTunes in that assessment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I googled &#8220;gimp is the worst piece of shit program I&#8217;ve ever used&#8221; and found this article.</p>
<p>I used Photoshop for many years, but decided to stop doing so when they began including the Apple virus called Bonjour with the package. Instead I&#8217;ve been using GIMP, and it is a source of so much frustration, it&#8217;s a wonder I haven&#8217;t had a heart attack yet. Everything, EVERY LITTLE FUCKING THING, defaults to the LAST possible thing you would want it to do, EVERYTHING is 100% counter-intuitive, to the extent that I have burst out laughing on many occasions. I often sit, mouth agape, staring in disbelief at the shit this program does. Just copy/pasting something is a NIGHTMARISH EXPERIENCE. I simply refuse to believe that this software was put together by people who have EVER used software of this type for anything other than doodling with the pencil tool.</p>
<p>I have never felt such deep-seated hatred for software before. GIMP is the worst, most amateurish piece of shit program I&#8217;ve ever used. And I&#8217;m including stuff like iTunes in that assessment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mistaniga</title>
		<link>http://piestar.net/2009/03/01/gimp-sucks/#comment-7570</link>
		<dc:creator>mistaniga</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 May 2010 13:24:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://piestar.net/?p=17#comment-7570</guid>
		<description>I was wondering if there are any black or jewish people posting here ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was wondering if there are any black or jewish people posting here ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neville Prinsloo</title>
		<link>http://piestar.net/2009/03/01/gimp-sucks/#comment-7565</link>
		<dc:creator>Neville Prinsloo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 May 2010 09:37:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://piestar.net/?p=17#comment-7565</guid>
		<description>Gimp should be withdrawn immediately, because it sucks eggs!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gimp should be withdrawn immediately, because it sucks eggs!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hengky Hartono</title>
		<link>http://piestar.net/2009/03/01/gimp-sucks/#comment-7490</link>
		<dc:creator>Hengky Hartono</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 May 2010 10:42:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://piestar.net/?p=17#comment-7490</guid>
		<description>I agree, GIMP is suck. You know what, i think before that GIMP is good for image editing. But now, uh... damn GIMP for Windows, it makes my computer hang while opening a large image (2000px X 8000px), i thought that maybe I run too many program, so i restart my computer. But after several tries, it still make my computer hang. Its okay for editing a 1024x768 or lower than that.
Then i tried to open the same image in Corel Photopaint, the file can be opened sucess, although its lagging on zoom, because of the low specification of my computer. I not recomended using GIMP for large image</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree, GIMP is suck. You know what, i think before that GIMP is good for image editing. But now, uh&#8230; damn GIMP for Windows, it makes my computer hang while opening a large image (2000px X 8000px), i thought that maybe I run too many program, so i restart my computer. But after several tries, it still make my computer hang. Its okay for editing a 1024&#215;768 or lower than that.<br />
Then i tried to open the same image in Corel Photopaint, the file can be opened sucess, although its lagging on zoom, because of the low specification of my computer. I not recomended using GIMP for large image</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.119 seconds -->
