04.23
Linux and it’s promoters have no interest in impartiality, in being ‘fair and balanced’, of fact checking and of getting to the bottom of something rather than going for dramatic impact, truth be damned.
Any fact or comment that paints Microsoft or any company that is on the designated ‘evil’ list in a bad light is jumped on voraciously, and outright lies and fabrications circle for months and are largely applauded by other members of the community when they are told. Truth is secondary to a good bashing.
Anything that paints Linux or FOSS in a bad light is automatically seen as being lies, astroturf and anyone who holds an opinion that doesn’t agree with the above is labelled a troll, a shill, and is accused of being paid by MS to spread lies. In the early days of Ubuntu I was chased out of town by zealots with pitchforks for daring to suggest having a bootsplash. Defend the program at all costs. Anyone who doesn’t agree with us (that’s 99.5% of the computing world) is obviously an uneducated idiot as the problem is certainly not with Linux – it’s FOSS thus perfect.
I’ve pretty much given up going to Slashdot for this very reason. It’s pretty much guaranteed that any thread that mentions MS (and a large percentage of those that don’t) will have at least a few ‘chair throwing’ jokes, not to mention the oh-so-humerous ‘but does it run Vista’ joke, and the bulk of the other comments from people living in a fantasy land where Linux is taking over the desktop, and where all software will soon be open source. I’ve even seen a start of the ‘But will it run Windows 7*’ jokes.
Here’s some news for you, if you have made the same joke THOUSANDS OF TIMES (seriously that many!) it loses it’s punch. It is no longer funny. Sure one joke out of every 200 or so is genuinely amusing, but now it’s just partisan MS bashing disguised as ‘humour’. Hell, you still see the constant BSOD jokes despite the only time I have ever seen one in the last 5+ years was due to hardware failure. It’s 2009, and the Linux community are still making jokes about a problem that hasn’t existed for years from a kernel that’s nearly 15 years old.
Basically, if you grasp at any reason to attack your opponent, and will defend your cause no matter the validity of the criticism then your opinion is no longer worth anything as you have sacrificed the truth, reality and essentially your credibility as you are no longer interested in facts and what is true – only in pushing an agenda.
I don’t use Linux and do you want to know why? Of course you don’t as I am wrong, or misinformed, or I just do not ‘understand’ and require having things explained to me like I am three years old**. As is everyone who doesn’t use Linux.
Zero attempt is made to ask the most important question: “Why don’t you use Linux?” as it is automatically assumed any problem is with the user, not the software. After all 0.5% of the population can’t be wrong. And nobody in the community has a problem. It’s not like pretty much everyone with any critical opinions left years ago. Is it?
* Windows 7 is going to ruin Linux. It’s everything Vista should have been. Of course if you live in Linux fantasy la-la land it’s nothing more than a Vista service pack.
* * I am 29 years old, I work as a programmer and yes, I do understand what the command line is as it is all you really had on an 8086.
*** I am not American so I am not really biased. If I was American I’d be a fiscal Conservative (and a traditional Republican). That being said the Neocons are a total joke and the complete antithesis of what the party should be about (Hint: It’s not about God, Guns and Gays). This isn’t about politics though so I won’t get into it!
Another anachronistic assertion (extra alliteration!) by the FOSS set is that Vista and Windows 7 are built on DOS( !! )
I am a member of the FOSS community. I used to be an avid Windows supporter, but I felt used by Microsoft. I know that Vista and 7 aren’t built from DOS. Windows Vista was built on Windows NT. I don’t know what 7 was built on.
@Thomas,
Sun, Novell, Red Hat, and Apple are in business to make money, period. Just like Microsoft.
For a long time Sun was criticized by the bearded forces of Linux and the FSF for not being Open Source. After a long time of plummeting stock prices, Sun started to open source some of their assets.
Notice, however that Sun made their real money from selling SPARC servers and Solaris, support, etc.
I don’t even know where to begin with Apple; they lock you into buying their hardware and their hardware only, if you want to use their OS.
Can you imagine the frenzy there would be if Microsoft did that?
Apple also makes use of Open Source software; GCC, X11, and much more, which they get free from the community and monetize. The same with Google.
The aforementioned companies are all corporations. They are legally obligated to care only about making money for their shareholders, though Sun and Novell haven’t been doing that very well.
Thomas, this excerpt from your blog:
“I still actually like Windows quite a bit, it made things easier. I just felt like I was helping a company who just wanted all my cash and didn’t care about what I thought. ”
Do you complain about “helping” McDonald’s, WalMart, Exxon, Amazon, etc?
Microsoft sells a product, and you can either buy it, or not buy it.
Insofar as caring what you think, do you think Apple cares? Do you think Canonical or any other distro is made up of caring individuals?
Try contacting [insert distro name]‘s developers and tell them “what you think”. Then be prepared for either indifference or extreme vitriol in return from them.
Let us know how it goes.
@Thomas
Here’s an example of how much Canonical (Ubuntu) “cares” about you and your “freedom”:
Ubuntu’s New Firefox Is Watching You
Slashdot article
Ubuntu zealots forum responses