2009
08.09

Normally I wouldn’t give the time to such people, but if he’s intent on spewing his copypasta everywhere then so be it.  So here we go!

Hello again everybody. First of all, you people are the noobish fanboys who I ranted about on my blog. It is you people who need to get a life!

Now the thing to remember is that he is probably, at most, fifteen.  He was saying in one post how he had to beg his parents for $30 for wifi in a hotel they were staying in.  Not that there is anything wrong with being young, no, but the fact is most of the people he’s calling ‘noobs’ have been using (and programming computers) for longer than he’s been alive.  Computers are not simple and despite his laughable claim that it only takes two weeks for someone to become an expert programmer, it takes years of study to truly come to a point where you can call yourself competent.

I agree with you people that a lot of Linux users can be immature, but this site is the HOME OF IMMATURE NOOBS. We need to get lives eh? At least us “freetards” don’t spend all day attacking an operating system that’s much better than Winblows made by Microshit.

You’ll notice I don’t refer to Linux as Linsux, Shitux, or even the new and improved Shitsux.  You are a fanboy.  You claim you’re not but you drank the kool-aid, took the red pill, or whatever it is you do to become a penguin worshipper.  You keep claiming that Windows sucks, that Linux is years ahead, that Linux is ‘so much better’, but utterly fail to even make one cogent point that backs up this assertion.

You also talked about ‘Solaris Linux’.  That one phrase alone declares you unable to make any comment about operating systems as the spectacular lack of knowlege to think that Solaris runs on the Linux kernel basically says you have no idea of the heritage of Unix.

Also almost every single tech site is overrun be freetards bashing MS and promoting Linux even when it is massively inappropriate for the task.  The whole Linux Hater thing is a response to the non-stop idiocy of the freetard community.  For every one anti-Linux post I can find you 100 anti MS posts, and no doubt I can find them faster.  In fact name me one popular tech site that isn’t infested with freetards and I’ll give you a cookie.

You hypocrites make me so fucking angry!

Us “freetards” aren’t giving our money to companies that don’t give a fuck about their customers, like Microsoft and Adobe and more!

I don’t think you understand how this capitalism thing works.  Here’s a quick reminder:

Someone makes and sells a product that does a task.  If the product does this task well the company will be successful.  If it doesn’t do it well they will be less successful.  The whole basis of this is an exchange of something that you want (a decent OS) for something that they want (Money).  If they ‘didn’t give a fuck about their customers’ then their customers would be less likely to give them money, thus they would do badly.  It is in their, and their shareholders, interests to ‘give a fuck’ as otherwise they will fail as a company.  As they should.

Then you have ‘Open Source’, who truly don’t give a shit about their customers, and who’s main reply to criticism is ‘Fuck off, it’s free’.  The capitalist evolutionary trait of survival of the fittest simply doesn’t apply, the evolutionary force of competing products doesn’t apply.  There is no incentive for anyone to do anything new and innovative as a: all the truly competent people have full time jobs as b: they won’t get anything out of it.  You may dislike what LH and myself say, but i’ve yet to see you actually coherently argue against any point apart from ‘wahh, they are being big meanies’.  And you end up with pieces of shit such as Gimp, Gnome, a massive reliance on CLI’s for everything and a failure to gain any marketshare whatsoever.  Windows 7 beat Linux marketshare months ago – is this because everyone installing a beta MS OS is an idiot, or because it’s simply better than Linux?

Actually, this is getting so fucking annoying, this constant bashing of an OS that is years ahead of Windows! Microsoft is finally making something good, because we all know that every operating since Windows 95 hasn’t had a new feature added.

Again with your failure to know anything about history.  Windows 98 was the ‘end of the line’ in terms of the 9x kernel, Windows 2000 built on top of NT, a true multitasking protected-memory kernel.  It’s be like running Gnome on top of BSD instead of Linux (but moreso) and claiming that this wasn’t anything new.  There have been hundreds of improvements made to Windows since 95, but you’re too much of a deluded newbie fanboy hater to understand.

Plus pretty much everything that makes Linux Linux is nicked from either the Unix world or Windows.  It’s a Unix rip-off system on a Windows rip-off GUI.  It’s so far from original it’s not funny.  And apart from the idiocy that is package management (I’ll get into this in a new post sometime) I can’t think of a single thing that can’t be traced back to someone else’s work.

Microsoft, I used to like, I used to defend. But they have gotten so fucking stupid, I just had to switch. They didn’t care about me, or any of their other customers. At least in the “freetard community,” we’re actually paid attention to.

You’re not paid attention to.  You just feel you’re part of some community, which is fine, but the needs of the tiny freetard section is largely ignored by Microsoft as what you want isn’t in their best interests and isn’t worth the time to implement anyhow.

A challenge:

If you truly feel you are being paid attention to then try this:  Go to a semi-official Linux forum and try giving constructive criticism, that is honest feedback.  Not I love Linux poetry, not anti Microsoft rants, but honest criticism.  If you need any tips just read LH or my blog – try this post, it’s quite inspirational.  If you can do this without creating an angry flamewar then maybe I am wrong, but I seriously doubt it.

The whole reason for this blog existing is that Linux sucks, yet idiots like you* spend you’re whole lives bashing MS and making outlandish claims while failing to actually contribute anything – except acting like a boat anchor to progress – to this great cause.

* I’ve realised that the people who promote Linux the most are the ones that know the least.  They have fervor, but lack understanding.  You get some idiot who only found out that CLI’s existed 6 months ago arguing with veterans of 20+ years about how typing apt-get install foobar** is actually more intuitive that just downloading an installer.  Put down your ‘RMS talking points’ cards and shut up.

** Which moron decided to call a sound app foobar anyway.  It’s like creating a domain name called ‘example.com’ or ‘localhost’.  Retards.

11 comments so far

Add Your Comment
  1. Great post! :)

    Keep going like this, and you might replace LH.

  2. at least GNU/Linux cares about its customers

  3. Kerberos,

    You’re about as cowardly as the (Anonymous) Linux Hater. He wouldn’t come on my show, will you? Guys like you can’t ever debate any of the things you say. Maybe you’ll surprise me.

    BRYAN LUNDUKE

  4. lol #2.

    #3: Nobody actually cares about you nor your show, sorry.

  5. In my opinion, Kerberos isn’t a Linux Hater.

    He is, like a lot of people, a linux’s immature community hater. I’m not saying the linux community is immature, I’m saying that the immature part of the community is what’s hated here, and everywhere on the net, even on slashdot.

    This part of the Linux community is actually a small minority of computer users, but they are making a lot of noise. Everybody hates them, but they still think they’re right because they’re making more noise than everybody.

    If they didn’t try to convert everyone (yes, I’m using “convert”, because for them it’s a religion), to bash MS and MS users, to say that Windows users are ignorant who use Windows only because they are idiots, then I don’t think there would be a LH blog.

  6. “You’re about as cowardly as the (Anonymous) Linux Hater. He wouldn’t come on my show, will you? Guys like you can’t ever debate any of the things you say. Maybe you’ll surprise me.”

    I really have no idea what you’d want to debate! Reading your blog you seem to think that:
    Free software isn’t economical for developers,
    Stallman is an obsolete idiot,
    Distros release half finished buggy crap as production.

    Where do our opinions diverge again?

  7. Teh L337 Blog appears to be no more

    http://mpscripts.dunsoft.org/blog/

  8. Actually, Teh 1337 Blog has moved to a different host.

  9. Kerberos, PLEASE comment on this latest Thomas B masterpiece:

    “Now Linux. Linux has horrible driver support…….. and that’s about it. Why? Because, the beauty of Linux being open source means that you can make it work EXACTLY like Windows or Mac. Sure, you’ll need a lot of years of C++ development under your belt, plus some design skills and more, but it is completely possible. Also, Linux gets no viruses, and is very stable (when someone who is used to it is working on it).

    Get Linux, I promise, you’ll be satisfied.”

    “…Ubuntu probably has better program support that Mac. ”

    http://mpscripts.omegasubs.com/blog/every-os-has-its-down-sides/#comments

  10. I am not really sure what to say on Thomas B’s latest inane ramblings. I think he is succeeding in making himself look like an idiot almost entirely without anyones help. Maybe he may even implode eventually? :)

  11. It seems he no longer allows allusions to “OpenSolaris Linux” on his blog.

    Perhaps because we’re not l337 enough to have heard of it?