Comments on: Free as in Freedom (to do as you’re told)

By: Teddy X

Teddy X — Sat, 27 Mar 2010 15:57:25 +0000

Why would someone in his/her right mind (not someone that has been brain washed by RS and other freeetards) think GPL is good in anyway. When you start working as a developer in a firm, inform the firm that they should not pay you salary. Tell them to pay you from money they get from support because you want them to give out the software for free. It seems freetards dont think for themselves, why must RS do the thinking for them?

By: QuedA

QuedA — Thu, 04 Feb 2010 05:09:42 +0000

Big problem with the GPL is that while the software may be free, the programmer’s options are limited. It’s the information’s freedoms, not the programmer’s freedoms.
Apparently the poor souls think that there’s a point to having morality and such apply to code.

By: anonymouZ

anonymouZ — Mon, 25 Jan 2010 10:53:29 +0000

… and btw.

I thought Google runs Linux? (i even do believe that someone claimed that they ran Linux, inhouse?)
Soo.. When the chinese are capable of hacking G$$gle.. Doesn’t that mean that g$$gle is, in fact, not that shining magic box o’ wonders that freetards believe it to be?

By: anonymouZ

anonymouZ — Mon, 25 Jan 2010 08:45:56 +0000

Sauce plz.

By: Mayim Bialik

Mayim Bialik — Mon, 25 Jan 2010 08:39:21 +0000

So the gaping security hole that was responsible for the Chineses hacking google doesn’t exist? Oh my how hatetards love to pretend reality has a big microsoft logo on it.

Queefer, learn to read.
Evidently someone over at Google fucked up hard.

By: pcavalcanti

pcavalcanti — Mon, 25 Jan 2010 03:14:49 +0000

@Adam King

just in case you haven´t read this already:

“It’s worth pointing out that the fuss over IE is because of an exploit that is only exploitable in IE6 (~10 year old browser) on XP (8 year old OS). To trigger it in Vista or Seven (on IE7 or you’d need to go out of your way to disable all kinds of default security settings, which although do not prevent the bug from triggering, prevent it from being exploitable, and on XP, you’d have to also go out of your way to disable things like DEP for it to do any damage.”

“Oh my how hatetards love to pretend reality has a big microsoft logo on it.”

whatever. as long as it doesn´t have a tux logo on it(specially if made on gimp), i´m fine with it.

By: Adam King

Adam King — Sun, 24 Jan 2010 23:08:55 +0000

So the gaping security hole that was responsible for the Chineses hacking google doesn’t exist? Oh my how hatetards love to pretend reality has a big microsoft logo on it.

By: Thomas B Hater

Thomas B Hater — Sun, 24 Jan 2010 19:03:19 +0000

Thomas B sucks African gorilla cock.

By: Kommenter

Kommenter — Sun, 24 Jan 2010 14:46:18 +0000

@Frank Lambert
“in linux you have a billion window managers and 2 different gui toolkits,
EFL, Motif, OpenMotif, FoxPro and TCL/Tk don’t get any love?”

Hahaha, i meant 2 MAIN gui toolkits, though i should probably have said 3, because motif is still used WAY too often.

By: Joey Lawrence

Joey Lawrence — Sun, 24 Jan 2010 07:19:17 +0000

@ Thomas

“hatertards”? Is it even possible for you to say anything without trying to get on someone’s “good side” anymore?

IE6 sucked (but was leaps and bounds better than what was available at the time of its release, though you’re forgiven for ignoring that, since you’re not old enough to remember the horrors of Netscape Communicator and early versions of Opera).

IE8 is quite good actually.

It’s worth pointing out that the fuss over IE is because of an exploit that is only exploitable in IE6 (~10 year old browser) on XP (8 year old OS). To trigger it in Vista or Seven (on IE7 or you’d need to go out of your way to disable all kinds of default security settings, which although do not prevent the bug from triggering, prevent it from being exploitable, and on XP, you’d have to also go out of your way to disable things like DEP for it to do any damage.